Each could make changes to the text and references. Typically, there are multiple authors on a research article. Winner: Mendeley Endnote vs Mendeley: Collaboration Mostly we add references by a combination of paper title, author, and keywords, but this still ends up being faster than doing this using Endnote. Often there is no keyword covering all references in one group that would make the Endnote feature useful. With Mendeley you search by author or keywords and add one reference at time, but for the whole group of citations. There is no option to add more references under a different keyword without going through the citation process again, then merging both citation lists. Unfortunately, once the references are selected the in-text citations are generated. This is great if you know a keyword that applied to all the papers you want to cite together.

With Endnote, you can search for keywords and select the relevant references to import. Endnote vs Mendeley: Cite while you WriteĮach software allows importing of references directly into MS Word while you write your research article. In this guide, we will compare Endnote vs Mendeley to help with your decision making. Each piece of software has their own strengths and weaknesses. However how do you choose? Which is better? “Better” is often subjective.

Therefore you can use Mendeley with one research article and Endnote for another.įor each research article, it is best to have all authors use the same piece of software. Reference lists though, can be interchanged between software. A MS Word document that is formatted using Mendeley, cannot be then formatted with Endnote. Unfortunately, reference managing software is not interchangeable.

Software such as Endnote and Mendeley partially automate these time-consuming tasks and make your research life easier. You don’t need to keep track of who you cited, in what order, or whether your reference list includes only who you cited in the paper. Reference managing software simplifies research publication.

Endnote alternatives